Quantcast
Channel: Architexturez South Asia
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1892

Brosius, Christiane, and Tina Schilbach. "Introduction: “Mind the Gap”: Thinking about in-between spaces in Delhi and Shanghai." City, Culture and Society 7 (2016): 221-226.

$
0
0
The contributions in this special issue are based on an interdisciplinary research project concerned with the formation of public spaces and urban imaginaries in Asia's global cities. The project has been based at Heidelberg University's Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe in a Global Context” (2009e12). This edited volume continues and deepens discussions the project members engaged in during an international workshop in Delhi in October 2010. Entitled “Spaces in-between: from non-place to shared space in developmental cities” and hosted by the Goethe-Institut in Delhi, the workshop set out to explore how new urban spaces in China (Shanghai) and India (Delhi) are not only consumed, contested and altered but are also performed and sensed as “in-between” places of transcultural entanglements. The workshop coincided with Shanghai's EXPO still being in full swing while the Commonwealth Games (CWG) had only just ended in Delhi. Both mega-events had mobilised radical visual transformations of public space and urban imaginaries. Although the urban spectacle was highlighting fleeting spaces of vanity, flattered by the grand and highly aestheticized gestures of competitive attention, access or dissent (Butcher & Velayutham, 2009), as well as by demolition and construction, we were interested in how it might also be a catalyst for alternative publics and public spheres to develop, or at least, to be imagined. Moreover, the concept of “in-between” spaces can not just be reduced to temporary space-use (“Zwischenraumnutzung”) in a “literal, geophysical” sense. As a concept, it encourages a view on fluid, even precarious interstices and boundaries nestled amidst concrete spatial arrangements and forms often taken for granted, attributed with particular e and sometimes one-dimensional e meaning. The “in-between” alerts us to a more differentiating, often self-reflexively questioning approach towards the intangible experiences and practices that exist but are often overseen. It is, thus, the look against the grain, the gaze between the clearly readable, the concept as heuristic tool, that is of utmost relevance for this Special Issue on urban semiotics and imaginaries.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1892

Trending Articles