Quantcast
Channel: Architexturez South Asia
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1892

Balbir Verma and Ors. vs Council of Architecture and Ors. on 26 May, 2010

$
0
0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 
W.P. (C) 8981-83/2006 & CM APPLs 6621/06, 11863/06, 12489/06, 2800/2007, 4207/08, 14335/09

BALBIR VERMA & ORS ...... .
Petitioners Through: Ms. Srikala Kumar, Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar and Mr. Subramanium Prasad, Advocates

versus

COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE & ORS ...... 
Respondents Through: Ms. Hetu Arora and Ms. Amrita Sharma,

Advocates for R-1 Mr. S.P. Arora, 
Advocate for R-2 Mr. Atul Nanda with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, 
Advocate for R-3/UOI Mr. Sanjoy Ghose with Ms. Anuj Aggarwal, 
Advocate for R-4

CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the order? No 
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes 
3. Whether the order should be reported in the Digest? Yes

Balbir Verma and Ors. vs Council of Architecture and Ors. on 26 May, 2010, Edited by Justice S. Muralidhar. The High Court of Delhi at New Delhi, 2010. The Architects Act (1972); The Central Excise Act, 1944

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1892

Trending Articles